Press tab to activate screen reader mode
  • Home
  • Language
  • Navigation menu
  • Search
  • Plain language
  • Content
  • Contact
MENU
Swiss Seismological Service logo ETH logo
DE EN FR IT
Plain language
DE EN FR IT
×
  • Home
  • Earthquakes
    • Switzerland
    • Europe
    • World
    • Maps
    • Report an earthquake
    • What to do?
      • Behavioural recommendations
      • Earthquakes abroad
      • Earthquake-resistant construction
      • Earthquake insurance
    • Always informed
      • Alerting
      • Receive information
      • Rapid impact assessment
      • ShakeMap
      • Earthquake announcements
  • Monitoring
    • Measuring earthquakes
    • National seismic network
    • Special networks
      • Overview
      • Geothermal energy Haute-Sorne
      • Geothermal energy Yverdon-les-Bains
      • Geothermal energy Geneva Basin
      • Geothermal energy Vinzel
      • Geological repository Northeastern Switzerland
      • Monitoring of the Borehole Basel-1
      • Past projects
    • Realtime seismograms
      • Last 5 minutes
      • Last 20 minutes
      • Last 2 hours
      • Last 24 hours
    • Setup of a monitoring station
    • Nuclear test ban treaty monitoring
  • Earthquake country Switzerland
    • Overview
    • Hazard
      • Overview
      • Components
      • Earthquake hazard model
    • Risk
      • Overview
      • Components
      • Earthquake risk model
      • Earthquake risk tool
    • Earthquake scenarios
    • Earthquake regions
      • Grisons
      • Valais
      • Basel
    • Historical earthquakes
      • The ten strongest
      • Basel 1356
      • Sierre 1946
    • Earthquake swarms
      • Introduction
      • Sarnen 1964
      • Diemtigen 2014 - 2015
  • Knowledge
    • Causes of earthquakes
      • In general
      • In Switzerland
      • In Europe
      • Induced earthquakes
    • Effects of earthquakes
    • Earthquake prediction
    • Earthquake data & web portals
      • Overview
      • Earthquake monitoring software
      • Station information
      • Earthquake catalogues
      • Waveform data
      • FDSN web services
      • Earthquake early warning
      • ShakeMap
      • Software archive
    • Geothermal energy & earthquakes
      • Geothermal energy in brief
      • Forms of geothermal energy
      • Geothermal energy & induced earthquakes
      • Measures to control induced seismicity
      • Geothermal energy in Switzerland
      • Geothermal energy and the SED
      • Seismological consulting (GEOBEST2020+)
      • Fracking
    • Quakes on Mars
    • Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
  • Research & teaching
    • Projects
    • Publications
    • Teaching & training
    • Schatzalp Workshop 2025
  • News & services
    • News articles
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • Archive
    • For schools
    • Brochures
    • Quiz
    • Videos & games
    • Earthquake simulator
    • Earthquake literature
  • About us
    • Contact & media enquires
    • Portrait
      • Tasks & organisation
      • History
      • Independence & transparency
    • Sections
    • All employees
    • Careers
    • Cooperations
    • Intranet
The content of the page starts here

DELAYED NEWZ

  • Overview
Project image

Quantifying time-varying seismicity rates is fundamentally important to protecting people who live in areas subject to extreme earthquake shaking. One primary difficulty with such assessment is determining how faults interact. Some recent studies have noted the ability of passing earthquake waves to increase the 'triggerability' of a fault in a delayed form of dynamic stressing: after seismic waves pass, faults are more prone to fail in a subsequent earthquake. The deadly Canterbury earthquake sequence has characteristics that suggest it was promoted by such distant, delayed, dynamic triggering. The sequence is also compatible with a model in which low-strain rate areas are efficient at storing and transferring static stresses. This has implications for earthquake clustering and the generation of damaging ground motion. We will apply recently-developed techniques in concert to address three questions: 1) Can we quantify distant and delayed triggering in this sequence? We will address this by correlating increased geodetic crustal velocities in Canterbury following the 2009 M7.8 Dusky Sound earthquake that occurred hundreds of km away. We will apply source scanning and template matching techniques to search Canterbury for microseismicity that was triggered by the M7.8 event. 2) Do earthquakes in low-strain rate areas exhibit more clustering and longer aftershock sequences than their high-strain rate counterparts, and do these earthquakes produce stronger ground motions? We will build a comprehensive model of earthquake generation in low-strain rate areas by using an earthquake simulator to model the evolution of the sequence. 3) Can the simulator model we develop demonstrate skill in seismicity forecast experiments? The model developed in this project could provide a true step change and bring seismology closer to bridging the gap between probabilistic forecasting and deterministic modelling of earthquake hazard.

Project Leader at SED

Prof. Stefan Wiemer

SED Project Members

Yifan Yin

Funding Source

ETH

Duration

2015-2019

Keywords

Delayed dynamic triggering; earthquake physics; earthquake simulator; earthquake forecasting

Research Field

Earthquake Hazard & Risk, Earthquake Statistics

Swiss Seismological Service
Sonneggstrasse 5
CH-8092 Zurich
Phone SED secretariat
+41 44 633 21 79 (during office hours)

Imprint | Disclaimer  | ©2024 ETH Zurich